EAD-536Rubric-ClinicalFieldExperienceA_RecruitingandInterviewing.pdf
Clinical Field Experience A: Recruiting and Interviewing – Rubric
Re�ection 12 points
Criteria Description
Reflection
5. Target 12 points
Reflection includes insightful strategies regarding the recruiting strategy and hiring
processes currently in place at the school.
4. Acceptable 10.44 points
Reflection includes strategies regarding the recruiting strategy and hiring processes
currently in place at the school.
3. Approaching 8.88 points
Reflection vaguely addresses strategies regarding the recruiting strategy and hiring
processes currently in place at the school.
2. Insufficient 8.28 points
Reflection does not address strategies regarding the recruiting strategy and hiring
processes currently in place at the school.
PSEL Standards 9 and 6 and Future Professional Practice 12 points
Criteria Description
PSEL Standards 9 and 6 and Future Professional Practice
5. Target 12 points
Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 9 are expertly incorporated into reflection.
4. Acceptable 10.44 points
Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 9 are accurately incorporated into reflection.
3. Approaching 8.88 points
Collapse All
Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 9 are weakly addressed.
2. Insufficient 8.28 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future
practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 9 are inaccurately addressed.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Organization 3 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 3 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 3 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 3 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Total 30 points
